Comments for this topic have been frozenIs it the intention of RPSGB to hand out 'golden goodbyes' to the lawyers in their employ once regulatory matters are taken out of their hands??
In its role as an employer, the Society will abide by the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations, (TUPE) when the GPhC is created. Staff falling within the scope of this legislation will be automatically transferred to the new regulator with no break in the continuity of their employment.
So may I take it that there will be no wastage of our retention fees upon compensatory payments for loss of income / severance of contract to law firms which RPSGB has engaged in the past?
Do the law firms involved get future work from the new regulatory body?
In final comment I cannot help but feel that over the years lawyer's pockets have been handsomely lined at the expense of the members
Thank you to all those who have made valid contributions to this discussion.
Unfortunately I have had to freeze this thread, due to the number of postings we have had that are merely advertising legal services, and add nothing to the debate. Such postings are in breach of the PJ Onlineterms and conditions, and have been removed.
Lawyer's severance pay
Lawyer's severance pay
Lawyer's Severence Pay
The Society MUST abide by the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations (TUPE).
Are the Lawyers employees?
Advert?
Thread frozen due to advertising
Thank you to all those who have made valid contributions to this discussion.
Unfortunately I have had to freeze this thread, due to the number of postings we have had that are merely advertising legal services, and add nothing to the debate. Such postings are in breach of the PJ Online terms and conditions, and have been removed.
Francesca
Francesca Rivers, PJ Online community support